Voici quelques pièces réalisées avec cet émail « Pierre de lave » :
L’obtention de cet émail « Pierre de lave » est arrivée au cours de mes recherches pour un Red de fer. En effet, après l’ajout de silice pour rendre mon Red de fer moins coulant, j’aperçois un émail satiné rouge sombre tirant vers le noir et ayant un peu de relief. J’imagine tout de suite un émail ressemblant à la lave.
I decided to test this enamel with my famous thickness test (You have a small description of the manufacture of the tool here) :
We notice that at important thickness, the enamel becomes literally red, even flowing. The image of lava is still present, I already imagine pieces whose enamel has this texture.
Before validating this glaze, I test it on larger pieces:
Although the glaze is more red than black, I like the look of it. It will be interesting to observe on pieces with more texture.
To obtain this glaze (Iron Red), I followed the same methodology as to obtain my Water Green glaze. Namely, I had my transparent oak ash based glaze to which I had added different oxides at different concentrations.
Here we can observe the addition of iron oxide at different concentrations:
With the highest iron concentration, we observe the appearance of red crystals. I explore this by adding silica:
This bodes well for a nice Iron Red! However, the glaze is quite runny, even with the sample with the most silica. I decide to continue in this direction and to add more silica:
A la suite de ce test, j’observe 2 résultats très intéressants! Celui de gauche qui va me procurer mon Red de fer, je pense, et celui de droite qui me fournit un émail un peu sous-cuit avec une texture et une couleur qui peuvent être exploitables. Vous pouvez suivre la suite du développement de l’émail « Pierre de lave » (à droite) ici.
I then decided to proceed with a thickness test on these 2 samples (you can find a small description of the tool manufacturing here):
Before validating this glaze, I test it on small pieces:
The result is very successful in my opinion. One of my most beautiful enamels!
Voici quelques pièces réalisées avec cet émail « Peau d’abricot » :
ref 20 086ref 30 039ref 70 013
Pour réaliser cet émail « Peau d’abricot », mon point de départ était mon émail blanc auquel j’ai ajouté du rutile en différentes proportions:
Samples 2 and 4 (red dot) hold my interest, so I keep these rutile concentrations.
Tin oxide (part of my white glaze) is a rather expensive raw material. According to the literature, it is possible to use zirconium silicate as a substitute. So I replace the tin oxide by zirconium silicate. I use the 2 concentrations of rutile selected above and vary the zirconium silicate in two different concentrations:
On the top, we find the low concentration of rutile and on the bottom the slightly higher concentration. The top tests seem a bit bland to me. Therefore, I abandon the tests with the lowest rutile concentration and concentrate on the sample (with the red dot), the one with the least zirconium silicate.
I decided to test a larger room to see the result:
Where the enamel thickness is greater, we find the slightly orange speckled aspect.
Unsuccessful attempts
At the same time, we observe the development of the orange hue with the increase of the rutile concentration. Therefore, I decide to increase it a little more:
The rutile concentration on the left gives the desired aspect. The 2 others give a more homogeneous and matte aspect which interests me less.
I add iron to this recipe to check if the orange color appears more pronounced :
This is an interesting test! I add it and comment it because we see that, in this case, we move away from the desired orange shade. At first we think, well, we've made a mistake and lost time. It's partly true... and many tests end up like that.
In order to stay in the process of obtaining more orange hue, I add a little bone ash:
then a little zinc oxide:
a little titanium oxide:
Finally, I decided to go back to the original sample during the zirconium test. I liked this aspect the most.
So I decided to do a thickness test using this recipe(link to build a small tool to measure the thickness of the enamel) :
That's it! After multiple tests, this enamel is validated!
Voici quelques pièces avec cet émail « Bave d’escargot »:
ref 20 064ref 30 035ref 50 008
Pour obtenir cet émail « Bave d’escargot », j’ai suivi la même méthodologie pour obtenir mon émail Vert d’eau. A savoir, j’avais mon émail Tressaillé transparent à base de cendre de chêne. Ensuite, j’ai ajouté différents oxydes à différentes concentrations.
Here we can see the addition of green chromium oxide at different concentrations:
This is the first time I see chromium giving blue! I decide to continue the tests by varying the silica and by keeping the 2 concentrations tested above:
Below, test with high green chromium oxide concentration:
Je trouve l’aspect un peu trop « chimique » et « fluorescent », je n’aime pas trop.
And below, second test with a lower concentration of green chromium oxide:
I have some difficulties to define the color obtained! Is it gray? White? Blue? Green? A mixture of all of these! Anyway, I like this shade!
I then decide to perform a thickness test (You have a small description of the tool making here) by adding a little green chromium oxide. For this, I place myself close to the sample with the low concentration above but much less than the tests with the high concentration of chromium oxide :
Voici quelques pièces avec cet émail « Champignon »:
ref 20 049ref 30 036ref 20 028
Pour aboutir à cet émail « Champignon », ma recherche autour de l’émail « Vert forêt » a été mon point de départ. Le test ci-dessous a été obtenu en ajoutant du kaolin et du cuivre à mon émail Tressaillé transparent à base de cendre de chêne:
So I selected the sample on the right (in the red dot on the picture above). The copper is replaced by nickel oxide in different proportions:
The middle result has my preference. You can see 2 brown colors, chocolate? However, we can see that at the bottom of the sample, the glaze is partially melted. In order to increase the fusibility of the glaze, I decided to lower the kaolin content. Here is what we get:
Je sélectionne l’échantillon n°3 (point rouge) qui apparaît un peu plus fondu mais qui ne coule pas et qui garde l’aspect « chocolat au lait ».
I decided to do a thickness test(link to build a small tool to measure the thickness of the enamel) with this base to confirm that this aspect is obtained:
The result is satisfactory. We can see that the sample with the thickness n°3 allows us to obtain the desired effect. We can also see that the enamel does not run, even with a large thickness.
Pour trouver cet émail « Bleu de chine », je suis parti du résultat de ma recherche autour de l’émail « Vert forêt« . Le test ci-dessous a été obtenu en ajoutant du kaolin et du cuivre à mon émail Tressaillé transparent à base de cendre de chêne:
My starting point was the sample (in the red dot on the picture above). I removed the copper oxide, which provides the green, and replaced it with cobalt in different proportions, which results in a glaze in the blue tones:
The test shows a melted glaze. In order to make it more fusible, I decide to proceed to a test by lowering the kaolin content (see below):
Sample #2 (with the red dot) shows a slightly glittery satin blue that looks promising to me! The samples with more kaolin are less melted. Sample #1 with less kaolin is starting to lose its satin look and also to sink. I decide to do a thickness test starting from this base (sample n°2)(link to build a small tool to measure the thickness of the glaze):
The result is good. We observe on the sample n°3 the aspect and the color sought.
L’obtention de cet émail « Météorite » fut un hasard. En effet, lors de recherches pour obtenir un Red de fer sont apparus les prémices de cet émail. A ce stade, je faisais varier la cendre d’os pour essayer de faire apparaître du rouge:
On this first try, I get a sample with a rough metallic appearance, which immediately makes me think of a meteorite. Here is a close-up:
I then decide to perform a cross test (addition and removal of silica in vertical and alumina in horizontal) starting from this sample:
At the same time, I decided to test the enamel on a larger piece:
On the crosshatch test, we find on the middle sample our metallic grey aspect. On the other hand, on the large samples it is less the case. We can see that when the enamel is thicker, .
I decide to do a thickness test(link to build a small tool to measure the thickness of the enamel):
We find the meteorite aspect with a great thickness. Unfortunately, the enamel becomes runny with this thickness and the installation will be complicated...
So I'm trying to lay it thick on a larger piece:
We can see that the enamel has flowed less than on a sample, we get the rough texture of the enamel. This will have to be confirmed on larger pieces, but it is satisfactory.
Pour trouver cet émail que je nomme « sahara », mon point de départ était ma recherche autour de l’émail Vert forêt. Le test ci-dessous a été trouvé en ajoutant du kaolin et du cuivre à mon émail Tressaillé transparent à base de cendre de chêne:
So I started with the sample (in the red dot on the picture above). I removed the copper and replaced it with rutile in different proportions:
The test with the larger amount of rutile gives me a matte but melted and slightly runny look. This is the first time I will be working with this type of glaze (matte). I find the look and the idea interesting. So I'm starting with this sample and testing it on larger pieces:
Small disappointment... The color is there, the matte aspect too but it doesn't really look like the visual of my sample... 2 solutions: either I didn't enamel the pieces thick enough, or I end up with the same disappointment during my tests for the development of the Forest Green enamel.
Before performing a thickness test, I decided to decrease the kaolin concentration at this base; here is the result:
The sample on the right (with the highest kaolin concentration and corresponding to the large piece tests above) shows again an interesting result. The very mixed results on the large pieces must be due to the thickness of the glaze, as I was able to prove when developing the Forest Green glaze.
A thickness test here too should make it possible to realize this(link to build a small tool to measure the thickness of the enamel):
Pour obtenir cet émail « Bleu cobalt », mon point de départ fut mes premières recherches avec la cendre de chêne, grâce auxquelles j’avais obtenu un émail Tressaillé transparent. Je décide donc de conserver cette même base et d’y ajouter des oxydes métalliques de cobalt en différentes proportions:
The enamel being quite transparent, I try to add zirconium silicate to try to make it more opaque, while keeping the crackle network:
We observe that at low concentration the zirconium silicate has no obvious effect and at high concentration the braiding is absent or masked. This is not the desired effect, so I go back to my original tests:
We can see that the glaze is very runny. The left sample lacks blue and the middle one has too much (in my opinion). I decide to continue the tests by using a concentration of cobalt between the 2 left tests. While selecting this concentration of oxides, I also add silica:
The result is more relevant. I choose the middle sample to proceed to a thickness test (You have a small description of the tool making here):
The enamel remains runny just like my Lichen Green, be sure to apply it to pieces that allow it.
Pour obtenir cet émail « Lin », j’ai suivi la même méthodologie pour obtenir mon émail Vert d’eau. A savoir, j’avais mon émail Tressaillé transparent à base de cendre de chêne. J’ai ensuite ajouté différents oxydes à différentes concentrations.
Here, the addition of nickel oxide at different concentrations is visible:
The 3rd sample seems interesting! Is the fact of having 2 different brown samples in the same glaze due to a different thickness or a beginning of crystallization? Anyway, I select this sample and I vary the silica:
Here we can clearly see the impact of silica on this glaze: more silica implies a less flowing and less melted glaze. I select the 2nd sample which does not flow too much but allows to keep the 2 different colors.
I can't wait to see what the thickness test is going to give (You have a description of the tool making process here). Will we keep the 2 colors? Will the result be yellow when the thickness is great and brown when it is less? :
Bingo! When the enamel appears, we get a beige/gray color while the enamel appears brown in thin layers or on the edges.